51�Թ�

As it happens, such evidence is not admissible in court under U.S. or international law, or even under the rules of Guantánamo’s military commissions.

A forensic psychiatrist questioned the veracity of the confessions and how they could have been admissible in court.

In his report, Smith wrote that, but “for Mr. Trump's election and imminent return to the Presidency, the Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.”

“Indeed, but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the Presidency, the Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.”

“But for Mr. Trump's election and imminent return to the Presidency, the Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial,” Smith wrote.